[92728] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Experiences on dampening
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fergie)
Mon Oct 9 17:33:12 2006
From: "Fergie" <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 21:29:44 GMT
To: sil@infiltrated.net
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
No idea w.r.t. SIP, but I assume that you have seen this?
"BGP Route Flap Dampening Considered Harmful"
http://www.ripe.net/docs/ripe-378.html
- ferg
-- "J. Oquendo" <sil@infiltrated.net> wrote:
Hey all, attempting to assess something related to networking but its on=
=
the SIP/telephony side of things. I'd like to know how many have had =
success and failures with route dampening. Purpose of this question is, =
=
I'm wondering about a method a VoIP PBX could take similar to BGP's =
dampening where the following would occur:
SIPUSER REGISTER (SEND SIPINFO + IP_INFO) --> Server
If SIPUSER decides to either REGISTER, INVITE, SUBSCRIBE, etc., in an =
insane amount of time, VoIP PBX would take action on it. Give SIPUSER an=
=
initial penalty and increment it justly however, it *cannot* be address =
=
based. It would likely be two predefined variables. Overall I just =
would like to know experiences, pros and cons, with dampening.
Thanks in advanced.
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawg(at)netzero.net
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
