[92259] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Kremen's Buddy?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Abley)
Tue Sep 12 18:56:06 2006

In-Reply-To: <001601c6d6b1$7b3e3e30$d701a8c0@PC145102827523>
Cc: "'Adi Linden'" <adil@adis.on.ca>, <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 18:55:11 -0400
To: Daniel Golding <dgolding@tier1research.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu



Le 2006-09-12 =E0 17:21, Daniel Golding a =E9crit :

> "=46rom each according to his abilities, to each according to his =20
> needs" could
> be replaced with "=46rom each according to the ARIN fee schedule, to =20=

> each
> according to our impossible to decipher allocation templates".

I find the references to alleged, inherent difficulties with the ARIN =20=

resource assignment process increasingly tedious. Even if the =20
templates were "impossible to decipher", this isn't the forum to =20
discuss them.

In my opinion, you do the argument in favour of open trading of =20
addresses as commodities a rank disservice by linking it to this kind =20=

of FUD.


Joe


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post