[92187] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Data Center Wiring Standards

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John L Lee)
Fri Sep 8 23:35:42 2006

Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:31:39 -0400
From: John L Lee <johnllee@mindspring.com>
To: Rick Kunkel <kunkel@w-link.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0609081724400.24867-100000@samwise.w-link.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080102070006030909000509
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Rick,

The organization and standards you are looking for are:

BICSI  -  http://www.bicsi.org/ and TIA/EIA 568 et al for structured 
cabling design for low voltage distribution.

The BICSI organization has training and certification for RCDD 
Registered Communications Distribution Designer

A BICSI article that is on there web site about data center design is 
http://www.bicsi.org/Content/Files/PDF/link2006/Kacperski.pdf.

TIA/EIA 568(ab) how ever many they are up to discuss structured cabling 
design for UTP/STP/fiber/coax including patch cables single and multi 
pair UTP/STP/fiber  patch panels,  HVAC control, fire system control and 
security systems.

John (ISDN) Lee



Rick Kunkel wrote:

>Heya folks,
>
>I hope this is on-topic.  I read the charter, and it falls somewhere along
>the fuzzy border I think...
>
>Can anyone tell me the standard way to deal with patch panels, racks, and
>switches in a data center used for colocation?  I've a sneaking suspicion
>that we're doing it in a fairly non-scalable way.  (I am not responsible
>for the current method, and I think I'm glad to say that.)  Strangely
>enough, I can find like NO resources on this.  I've spent the better part
>of two hours looking.
>
>Right now, we have a rack filled with nothing but patch panels.  We have
>some switches in another rack, and colocation customers scattered around
>other racks.  When a new customer comes in, we run a long wire from their
>computer(s) and/or other device(s) to the patch panel.  Then, from the
>appropriate block connectors on the back of the panel, we run another wire
>that terminates in a RJ-45 to plug into the switch.
>
>Sounds bonkers I think, doesn't it?
>
>My thoughts go like this:  We put a patch panel in each rack.  Each of
>these patch panels is permanently (more or less) wired to a patch panel in
>our main patch cabinet.  So, essentially what you've got is a main patch
>cabinet with a patch panel that corresponds to a patch panel in each other
>cabinet.  Making connection is cinchy and only requires 3-6 foot
>off-the-shelf cables.
>
>Does that sound more correct?
>
>I talked to someone else in the office here, and they believe that they've
>seen it done with a switch in each cabinet, although they couldn't
>remember is there was a patch panel as well.  If you're running 802.1q
>trunks between a bunch of switches (no patch-panels needed), I can see
>that working too, I suppose.
>
>Any standards?  Best practices?  Suggestions?  Resources, in the form of
>books, web pages, RFCs, or white papers?
>
>Thanks!
>
>Rick Kunkel
>
>
>
>  
>

--------------080102070006030909000509
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<big>Rick,<br>
<br>
The organization and standards you are looking for are:<br>
<br>
BICSI&nbsp; -&nbsp; <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.bicsi.org/">http://www.bicsi.org/</a> and TIA/EIA 568 et al for structured
cabling design for low voltage distribution.<br>
<br>
The BICSI organization has training and certification for RCDD
Registered Communications Distribution Designer<br>
<br>
A BICSI article that is on there web site about data center design is
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.bicsi.org/Content/Files/PDF/link2006/Kacperski.pdf">http://www.bicsi.org/Content/Files/PDF/link2006/Kacperski.pdf</a>.<br>
<br>
TIA/EIA 568(ab) how ever many they are up to discuss structured cabling
design for UTP/STP/fiber/coax including patch cables single and multi
pair UTP/STP/fiber&nbsp; patch panels,&nbsp; HVAC control, fire system control
and security systems.<br>
<br>
John (ISDN) Lee <br>
</big><br>
<br>
<br>
Rick Kunkel wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
 cite="midPine.LNX.4.44.0609081724400.24867-100000@samwise.w-link.net">
  <pre wrap="">Heya folks,

I hope this is on-topic.  I read the charter, and it falls somewhere along
the fuzzy border I think...

Can anyone tell me the standard way to deal with patch panels, racks, and
switches in a data center used for colocation?  I've a sneaking suspicion
that we're doing it in a fairly non-scalable way.  (I am not responsible
for the current method, and I think I'm glad to say that.)  Strangely
enough, I can find like NO resources on this.  I've spent the better part
of two hours looking.

Right now, we have a rack filled with nothing but patch panels.  We have
some switches in another rack, and colocation customers scattered around
other racks.  When a new customer comes in, we run a long wire from their
computer(s) and/or other device(s) to the patch panel.  Then, from the
appropriate block connectors on the back of the panel, we run another wire
that terminates in a RJ-45 to plug into the switch.

Sounds bonkers I think, doesn't it?

My thoughts go like this:  We put a patch panel in each rack.  Each of
these patch panels is permanently (more or less) wired to a patch panel in
our main patch cabinet.  So, essentially what you've got is a main patch
cabinet with a patch panel that corresponds to a patch panel in each other
cabinet.  Making connection is cinchy and only requires 3-6 foot
off-the-shelf cables.

Does that sound more correct?

I talked to someone else in the office here, and they believe that they've
seen it done with a switch in each cabinet, although they couldn't
remember is there was a patch panel as well.  If you're running 802.1q
trunks between a bunch of switches (no patch-panels needed), I can see
that working too, I suppose.

Any standards?  Best practices?  Suggestions?  Resources, in the form of
books, web pages, RFCs, or white papers?

Thanks!

Rick Kunkel



  </pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------080102070006030909000509--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post