[92056] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Spain was offline
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Mon Sep 4 21:28:08 2006
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:26:45 -0400
To: Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net>
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@renesys.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20060904100501.GA7780@guest-wv-15.ripe.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
At 06:05 AM 9/4/2006, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>On 01.09 13:47, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> >
> > I can't get a TLD zone? But back to the root servers. Are you
> > agreering with me that if I announce F and I root's netblocks
> > inside of my own network that everyone would be ok with that?
> >
> > C'mon Joe, straight answer on that one. :)
>
>Straight answer: No.
>
>
>Exercises:
>
>Who is responsible if this set-up fails?
>
>Who is responsible if it lies?
>
>Who is likely to get blamed for any failures?
The burden is already on the provider. The providers
answer the call when these things break or perform badly.
>Would this require explicit consent from all customers
>subject to such treatment?
I don't think so. There's no guarantee that an
internal route facing a customer is "RIPE K ROOT".
Peers may feel differently, but I wouldn't advocate
exporting (unless they did and perhaps would pay me for
better access to the application). That's different.
[ snip ]
-M<
(thanks for operating K, it is one of the better ones from my
measurements but that's part of the problem now isn't it? Consistency
in some areas.)
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation (w) 617-395-8574
Member of Technical Staff Network Operations
hannigan@renesys.com
