[91848] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Fwd: Blogger post failed
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen Massar)
Tue Aug 15 05:22:24 2006
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: "Derek J. Balling" <deballing@vassar.edu>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <48DFF7DC-87F5-421D-AA82-3202F10C2948@vassar.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:21:45 +0200
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--=-6w+D/Rcv1CZa8KAM3gVo
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 12:31 -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote:
> Who forwards NANOG posts to a blogger gateway? You, me, and a
> claw-hammer need to have a chat.
Can I join in the fun? I'll bring some tubing along, Sin City style ;)
> Begin forwarded message:
> >=20
> > Blogger does not accept multipart/signed files.
I've also mailed nanog-admin@nanog.org about this, like two weeks ago,
but I guess they are on holidays or they don't accept multipart/signed
messages I guess ;) Next to the fact that it is nearly impossible to
find the culprit as the stupid blogger crap doesn't list the path over
which they actually received the message.
Apparently other lists have had similar issues before:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-December/020911.html
Longer, partially german version:
http://www.fabiankeil.de/blog-surrogat/2006/05/23/blogger.com-netz-terroris=
ten-teil-2.html
or short: blogger.com can't care less, there seem to be a lot more of
these cases when simply googling for postgateway@blogger.com, simply
checking for people subscribed from @blogger.com might help to find the
culprit though. Other routine would be to send a signed message to every
single subscriber, maybe starting from the newest subscribers down and
see which one pongs back with this crap.
Greets,
Jeroen
PS: the mailto:nanog-admin@nanog.org link on:
http://www.nanog.org/listadmins.html is broken as it has
"mailto://nanog-admin@nanog.org", which should be without the slashes.
--=-6w+D/Rcv1CZa8KAM3gVo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Jeroen Massar / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iHUEABECADUFAkThkikuFIAAAAAAFQAQcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JnamVy
b2VuQHVuZml4Lm9yZwAKCRApqihSMz58IyV0AKC1RYaOqONttO6kJ6ud8/SCgXY3
6wCgu/foHY+mrc5aSBN42tIHF8EPg9o=
=br2J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-6w+D/Rcv1CZa8KAM3gVo--
