[91807] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: i am not a list moderator, but i do have a request
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Danny McPherson)
Sun Aug 13 17:16:16 2006
In-Reply-To: <g364gwzcgl.fsf@sa.vix.com>
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:17:09 -0600
To: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Aug 13, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> which is, please move these threads to a non-SP mailing list.
>
> R [ 41: Danny McPherson ] Re: mitigating botnet C&Cs has
> become useless
> R [ 22: "Laurence F. Sheldon]
> R < 45: Danny McPherson >
> R [ 62: "Laurence F. Sheldon]
> R [ 162: "J. Oquendo" ] Re: [Full-disclosure] what can be
> done with botnet C&C's?
> R < 211: "Payam Tarverdyan Ch>
> R [ 66: Michael Nicks ]
>
> i already apologized to the moderators for participating in a non-
> ops thread
> here. there are plenty of mailing lists for which botnets are on-
> topic.
> nanog is not one and should not become one. nanog has other useful
> purposes.
Interestingly enough, I lurk here 99.999% of the time. I comment
on this thread and folks ask to move it to a non-SP mailing list?
Perhaps
non-operational, but this certainly has direct implications on SPs and
I'm of the opinion it's quite relevant - well, certainly as relevant
as the
past recent threads:
SORBS Contact
New Latop Policies
Fingerprinting and SPAM ID
MPLS Gear for Outside Plant
[perhaps] Fedex Contact
Citrix Load-balancing
Detecting Parked Domains
I suppose it's more "what I feel like reading and sending email
about", as
opposed to whether/what's on topic or not. I'm done with this thread on
NANOG - else the slew of "me too" responses on this "list moderator"
thread
will divert attention from alternative cruft...
Wondering if I should send a message to NANOG every time I see a thread
of questionable NANOG relevance,
-danny
