[9151] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IAHC Backtracks on Registrar Lottery
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert E. Seastrom)
Wed May 7 12:18:42 1997
Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 12:07:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs@bifrost.seastrom.com>
To: jamie@dilbert.iagnet.net
CC: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: <199705071535.LAA20323@dilbert.iagnet.net>
(jamie@dilbert.iagnet.net)
Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 11:35:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: jamie@dilbert.iagnet.net (Jamie Rishaw)
I can probably speak for a _lot_ of people when I say that we will
probably continue to do business exclusively with the InterNIC, no
matter how cheap the others are: The InterNIC has proven itself to
me to be reliable, stable, and in the case where problems _do_ come
up they're very responsive.
Clearly, this is some use of the words "reliable", "stable", and
"responsive" to which I am heretofore unaccustomed.
They basically started the whole ballgame, why change?
I'll bet there are people at SRI International and Government Systems
Inc who woud be very interested to learn that!
---rob
