[91463] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AW: mitigating botnet C&Cs has become useless
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Jul 31 13:44:27 2006
To: Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org>
Cc: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>,
Gunther Stammwitz <gstammw@gmx.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:30:48 CDT."
<Pine.LNX.4.21.0607311229440.9046-100000@linuxbox.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:43:44 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1154367824_3409P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:30:48 CDT, Gadi Evron said:
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Dean Anderson wrote:
> > You are approaching the problem the wrong way. Many failover systems
> > work very well when the primary fails entirely--when the salesman pulls
> > the plug. Few work well when the primary doesn't entirely fail, but
> > just doesn't work correctly, as is usually the case in the real world.
>
> Such as? How does it apply to the network world?
What, you never had a BGP session to a peer router that lied through its
teeth about its other interfaces being up, so you didn't fallover to
an alternate route? :)
--==_Exmh_1154367824_3409P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFEzkFQcC3lWbTT17ARAk4oAKDYv87tS9OQSzLZE/skaQHiD3OTlQCg/G0I
nuq2jaMiC6duvYVKznZ+vy8=
=Fl9K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1154367824_3409P--
