[91346] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Deaggregation Disease
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rob Evans)
Fri Jul 21 09:18:57 2006
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:17:15 +0100
From: "Rob Evans" <internetplumber@gmail.com>
To: "Fredy Kuenzler" <kuenzler@init7.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <44C0CB9C.9060100@init7.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> Just to make it clear: AS4151 was 9 month ago. Now we see history again
> with new actors. (I guess the actual increase was done by various ASN of
> RENATER).
I'm curious how you reach the conclusion that RENATER has contributed
to many of the prefixes over the last week. They do seem to have
announced a bunch of prefixes that could be aggregated, but look at
the following report:
http://www.cidr-report.org/as-prefixes.txt
There seem to be a whole load of ASNs that have deaggregated. AS5416,
AS5639, AS6140, AS9121, AS13049, AS16130, AS17849, AS18049 (that's as
far as I got before getting bored). Some of these are advertising the
covering prefix too, so they're certainly aware of how to aggregate.
Rob
