|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:48:48 +0200 From: Peter Dambier <peter@peter-dambier.de> Reply-To: peter@peter-dambier.de Cc: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <68960606-E751-437D-869C-8B50475854A9@everydns.net> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu Having seen a lot cons and little pros, here is my scenario: I am running my own root, a copy of the Cesidan Root plus some TLDs of my own liking, some shared with "friends" who dont want to risk cache poisoning. I am runnings both djbdns (dnscache with tinydns and axfrdns as root) and Bind 9.4.0.a6 I have seen that my own nameservers are always faster than my ISP's. I like the idea of catching the phishermen before they can catch me, although I am not running Phishermans friend (windows eXPerimental). I have seen with my own eyes on a windowssystem OpenDNS is a MUST. Even if I dont click on install or execute... and I do not trust open MACs too very much either. I do not neccessarily improove speed when using OpenDNS and I am not shure wether I want OpenDNS decide between typos and alt. TLDs. But I still want to catch the phishermen. Does it make sense for me and the mine? Kind regards Peter and Karin -- Peter and Karin Dambier Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana Graeffstrasse 14 D-64646 Heppenheim +49(6252)671-788 (Telekom) +49(179)108-3978 (O2 Genion) +49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de) mail: peter@peter-dambier.de mail: peter@echnaton.serveftp.com http://iason.site.voila.fr/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |