[90744] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Abley)
Tue Jun 13 14:46:03 2006

In-Reply-To: <17551.1492.563783.182802@roam.psg.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:45:34 -0400
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu



On 13-Jun-2006, at 14:37, Randy Bush wrote:

>> I don't profess to speak for ISC here, but it may be worth noting
>> that ISC staff continue to spend a lot of time travelling to operator
>> meetings, workshops, root server installations and RIR and ICANN
>> meetings. Outreach and community participation is one of the core
>> things that ISC does.
>>
>> It's not unreasonable to think that for a lot of zone operators
>> (ccTLD or otherwise), the mountain will eventually come to Mohammed,
>> and travel by the zone operator won't be necessary.
>
> can you say "does not scale?"

Indeed.

With the current trust policy, it seems to me that DLV is a bootstrap  
mechanism intended to promote bottom-up pressure for DNSSEC  
deployment, and to give people a chance to get to grips with things  
like key rollover and zone signing.

It's a frog dressed up as a chicken which is being rolled out because  
people are fed up waiting for an egg.

In that context, perhaps it doesn't need to scale very far.


Joe


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post