[90719] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Todd Underwood)
Mon Jun 12 13:05:51 2006
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:02:11 -0400
From: Todd Underwood <todd-nanog@renesys.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <17549.38957.734427.297100@roam.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
randy, all,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:37:01AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> > michael, all,
>
> [ if you can't use procmail, could you at least respond to non-ops
> trolls on the nanog-futures list? ]
indeed. i don't use the former but i should have used the latter.
apologies.
> but todd, you have a bit of clue. do you have a clue at all
> regarding the question i asked on-list the other day?
>
> what is the security policy that isc plans to use over the
> content of the isc dlv registry? and how will the dvl trust
> key roll-over and revocation be handled?
i don't. i've been reading the spec recently and trying to catch up
on the contents of the recent nanog meeting that i was unable to
attend. i've been a long-term sceptic of dns-sec due to the lack of
any movement on the issuing of a root key (and the multiple,
incompatible changes in the protocol itself), but this effort looks
interesting.
> if the above can not be very clearly answered (by isc?), then this
> proposal is techno-political hubris at best.
yes, or an interesting proof-of-concept that can be taken-up and
completed by someone else.
t.
--
_____________________________________________________________________
todd underwood +1 603 643 9300 x101
renesys corporation chief of operations & security
todd@renesys.com http://www.renesys.com/blog/todd.shtml
