[90684] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Extreme Networks BD 6808 errors -- help to interpret.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Abley)
Sat Jun 10 13:16:25 2006
In-Reply-To: <448A9A76.6070400@ahnberg.pp.se>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: nanog-futures@nanog.org
From: Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:15:15 -0400
To: Mattias Ahnberg <mattias@ahnberg.pp.se>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
(followups set)
On 10-Jun-2006, at 06:09, Mattias Ahnberg wrote:
> Mattias Ahnberg wrote:
>> I've recently stumbled over an error in the logs of one of my
>> Black Diamond
>> 6808's. Due to redundant MSMs this hasn't had any practical effect
>> yet, but
>> I have just initiated a ticket on the matter.
>
> I just got word from a few members that my post was seriously off
> topic. I
> did try to study the information at http://www.nanog.org/
> listfaq.html before
> I posted just to be certain, and my view is that I couldn't find
> anything
> that outruled a posting like my own.
It's the AUP that determines what's on-topic for the list, not the
FAQ. Your message was perfectly fine for the NANOG list according to
the AUP.
However, in the interests of getting you a good answer to your
question, you might find the following list more useful than this one:
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/extreme-nsp
This advice is also in the FAQ you quoted (well, kind of: see <http://
www.nanog.org/listfaq.html#routerconfig>).
> I have probably missed something, perhaps unwritten policy, and for
> that I
> am sorry. I will not repeat my mistake.
Getting flamed by other subscribers is all part of life in the big
city :-)
Joe
