|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 07:44:04 -0700 (PDT) From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net> To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> Cc: Mikisa Richard <rmikisa@gmail.com>, nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOC.4.61.0605260709080.23250@paixhost.pch.net> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On Fri, 26 May 2006, Bill Woodcock wrote: > On Fri, 26 May 2006, Mikisa Richard wrote: > > Can't be sure what they did, but I received an e-mail asking me to check > > on my connectivity to them and well, it worked. > > Presumably they're double-natting. I had to do that once for Y2K > compliance for three large governmental networks that were all statically > addressed in net-10 and wouldn't/couldn't renumber in time. In fact, > there were _specific hosts_ which had the same IP address, and _had to > talk to each other_. Gross. But it can be done. Please explain how. I simply can't imagine my computer communicating with another one with exactly same ip address - the packet would never leave it. The only way I see to achieve this is to have dns resolver on the fly convert remote addresses from same network into some other network and then NAT from those other addresses. -- William Leibzon Elan Networks william@elan.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |