[90087] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: data center space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Apr 25 00:40:32 2006
To: Jim Popovitch <jimpop@yahoo.com>
Cc: "'nanog'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:43:47 EDT."
<444D8CE3.3020408@yahoo.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:39:52 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1145939992_2527P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:43:47 EDT, Jim Popovitch said:
> all know what the next big threats are (nuclear and/or biological), is
> it worth the risk that the next (and there will be) event is small
> enough not to affect an area 65 miles across?
If I was a Manhattan based company, and an event took out everything within
65 miles of there, whether my backups are OK is suddenly going to be the *least*
of my concerns.
(Hint - what percent of your employees commute *less* than 65 miles to work,
and what disaster-recovery plans do you have for *them*?)
--==_Exmh_1145939992_2527P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFETagYcC3lWbTT17ARAvZcAKDN/xLY/pYrX6mUM7x49JbjevL14gCgul11
E/i9XiYk8W1s0G/9PDYiVe0=
=kpuc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1145939992_2527P--
