[89886] in North American Network Operators' Group
well-known NTP? (Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Edward B. DREGER)
Tue Apr 11 18:02:45 2006
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 22:01:10 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <200604112030.k3BKUCvV020674@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:30:11 -0400
> From: Valdis.Kletnieks
> I suppose pointing out that the Internet works because providers
> *cooperate* and *agree on protocols* would be pointless....
To a certain [limited] extent, anyway, as countless NANOG-L threads
prove time and again. Of course, it's hard to view D-Link as
"cooperative" in this instance.
AS112-style NTP service, anyone? That would be cooperative and possibly
even useful.
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc@brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq@intc.net -*- sam@everquick.net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
