[89762] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Apr 4 10:39:22 2006
To: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>
Cc: Michael Painter <tvhawaii@shaka.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:43:20 EDT."
<3F8677D2-C48D-49C6-9C99-89168085BB9C@sackheads.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:34:11 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1144161251_2754P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:43:20 EDT, John Payne said:
> Bah, someone else mentioned them just recently. From my point of
> view, all they seem to do is scattershot any addresses they can find
> that's even remotely related.
Given the fact that the type of places that the PIRT people need to notify
are the kind of places that also have non-functional abuse@ addresses,
do you have an actual *better* suggestion?
--==_Exmh_1144161251_2754P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFEMoPjcC3lWbTT17ARAoc3AJ4zQHSjMm6FXrniQ8digtgUi0N4vgCdHM6P
5syMN5BuZ9HHQ0Smy8J1iEs=
=wj6t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1144161251_2754P--
