| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 08:34:52 -0500 From: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net> To: nanog list <nanog@merit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>, nanog list <nanog@merit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.63.0604030914020.6524@jvc> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu Once upon a time, Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org> said: > Xen is not, however, backed with > extensive commercial support (XenSource is still evolving at the moment), Red Hat has announced that the next rev of their commercial OS offering, RHEL 5, will include Xen as a major component. > lacks easy integration into popular UI/control-panel products, and requires > special kernels for the contained OS's (not such a big deal in practice). With the right CPUs (late model Intel only at the moment), you can run an OS unmodified with a little higher overhead. This means you can run Windows on the same box as Linux on the same box as *BSD, all at the same time. Later this year, AMD's CPUs will add a similar (but different) extension. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |