[89417] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Wiltel has gone pink.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jo Rhett)
Tue Mar 14 15:25:14 2006

Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:22:33 -0800
From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@svcolo.com>
To: andrew2@one.net
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: andrew2@one.net, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20060313210527.8528618BE@fiji.merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:05:25PM -0500, andrew2@one.net wrote:
> Or perhaps there's a more reasonable explanation like being assimilated
> with Level3 and perhaps some contact info. is a little stale at this
> point in the merger process...  Never attribute to malfeasance what can
> be explained by everyday corporate beauracracy.
 
I'm missing the point where I am supposed to care.  The regulations
concerning proper contact information don't mention this exception.

Complete and utter incompetence (ie spam filtering their abuse mailbox) are
to blame for mail being rejected, and the phone numbers being out of date
are their fault, not a valid excuse.

-- 
Jo Rhett
senior geek
SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post