[89328] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: shim6 @ NANOG
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Jakma)
Tue Mar 7 19:14:28 2006
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 00:12:47 +0000 (GMT)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>,
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@cisco.com>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <6DC0DCC8-2844-4D86-97F4-670D71E2B02E@muada.com>
Mail-Copies-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Mail-Followup-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> Hm, I would rather do this globally but maybe this is the way to go...
Geo-aggregation is something that stands its best chance of being
implemented locally:
- the 'players' involved will be fewer
- requirements for a workable policy will be easier to work out
(and fewer conflicts between requirements)
- there may be existing 'arbiter of last resort' (particularly at
national levels) to resolve the inevitable conflicts.
Ie this may be best done even /below/ the RIR level (though, RIR
agreement would be needed).
Still though, hard to see it happening without some acceptance by
operators.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
The public is an old woman. Let her maunder and mumble.
-- Thomas Carlyle
