[89291] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexei Roudnev)
Tue Mar 7 02:51:32 2006
From: "Alexei Roudnev" <alex@relcom.net>
To: "Stephen Sprunk" <stephen@sprunk.org>,
<Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com>
Cc: "North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 23:46:36 -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
>
> Thus spake <Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com>
> > Let's face it, IPv6 is close enough to IPv4 that any
> > attempt to put a price on IPv4 addresses will simply
> > cause a massive migration to free and plentiful IPv6
> > addresses.
>
> You assume that there will be a source of free and plentiful IPv6
addresses.
Why not? It is CORE idea of IPcv6 addres space (no matter whart is written
abouyt allocation policies).
And I can bet, we will see how every business can get PI space when required
(in ipv6) for multi home,
in less than 3 - 4 years.
Except if IPv6 will be replaced by something simpler and more reliable like
IPv8 (but it looks very unlikely now).
