[89215] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: searching for BGP table donors
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marshall Eubanks)
Sun Mar 5 17:06:04 2006
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0603052102390.6136@pop.ict1.everquick.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 17:05:10 -0500
To: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
You (or anyone else) are welcome to pick up the bgp view from here at
http://www.multicasttech.com/status/bgp.full.gz
It's updated every 6 hours.
Regards
Marshall
On Mar 5, 2006, at 4:38 PM, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
>
> The fuss over shim6, routing table size, and long-prefix PI space
> has intrigued me. I've started analyzing some [simulated] FIBs and
> believe I may have found something interesting. In the name of
> statistical sampling, I'd like to analyze some other [simulated]
> FIBs from different BGP views.
>
> Would anyone be interested in donating "show ip bgp" output? I
> assume most people are familiar with script(1), but will mention it
> here, in passing, "just in case". Compressed via bzip2 or rzip
> strongly preferred; there's a reason I'm not keen to try this on
> public route servers. ;-)
>
> Email is fine for up to a few megabytes. If anyone feels like
> sending output from so many routers that even a compressed tarball
> exceeds that, ping me to set up an FTP drop.
>
> Network topology and size matter not. "The more the merrier" when
> it comes to data analysis. :-)
>
>
> TIA,
> Eddy
> --
> Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
> A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
> Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
> Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
> Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
> ______________________________________________________________________
> __
> DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
> davidc@brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq@intc.net -*- sam@everquick.net
> Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
> Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software
> backscatter.
