[88724] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Jakma)
Wed Feb 15 18:40:39 2006
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:41:15 +0000 (GMT)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
Reply-To: paul@clubi.ie, nanog@merit.edu
To: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0602151951170.15765@pop.ict1.everquick.net>
Mail-Copies-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Mail-Followup-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
<aside: text below seems to reply to me specifically, but for some
strange reason you decided to strip my address from your reply.>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> BTW, Paul, FixedOrbit reports 701 as having ~1500 peers and
> downstreams. As interconnected as even they are, that's still a far
> cry from the full-mesh O(N^2) situation you seemed to suggest.
I'm not sure what bearing any specific number has on O(n^2)
behaviour. However, if you want to look at specific numbers, plug
'10' in there, then try '20'.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Avoid reality at all costs.
