[88709] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Jakma)
Wed Feb 15 15:48:03 2006
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:46:33 +0000 (GMT)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
Cc: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <05F5D16E-DF33-4465-A4A9-97791B46032F@multicasttech.com>
Mail-Copies-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Mail-Followup-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> very limited. Here in Western Fairfax, basically just the two
> mentioned. Why not create aggregation ASN that exploit that ?
Well you don't need to assign an ASN for Cox and SBC to announce a
shared prefix for a start off.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Today I will gladly share my experience and advice, for there are no sweeter
words than "I told you so."
