[88695] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Jakma)
Wed Feb 15 14:01:46 2006
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:02:11 +0000 (GMT)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
To: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0602151657340.31796@pop.ict1.everquick.net>
Mail-Copies-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Mail-Followup-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> Of course not. Let SBC and Cox obtain a _joint_ ASN and _joint_
> address space. Each provider announces the aggregate co-op space
> via the joint ASN as a downstream.
This is unworkable obviously: Think next about SBC and (say) Verizon
customers, then what about those with Cox and Verizon, then
SBC/Cox/Verizon. etc.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
It is amazing how complete is the delusion that beauty is goodness.
