[8858] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Also, re: 7007
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jon Green)
Sat Apr 26 12:56:18 1997
To: Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 25 Apr 1997 17:55:03 EDT."
<199704252155.RAA26064@access.netaxs.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 11:46:06 -0500
From: Jon Green <jcgreen@netins.net>
On Fri, 25 Apr 1997 17:55:03 -0400 (EDT), freedman@netaxs.com writes:
>MAI is still working with Bay at their data center to reach the point
>that they're comfortable re-advertising their routes directly. Ciscos
>have been offered to MAI, but MAI is still working with Bay.
As well they should. Why is misconfiguration of a router a reason
to change vendors? How about if we prove the existence of a bug before
spreading rumors? There are some very large networks running on Bay
routers, one of which I used to run. I've always found that proper
configuration did wonders for making it work correctly.
-Jon
-----------------------------------------------------------------
* Jon Green * "Life's a dance *
* jcgreen@netINS.net * you learn as you go" *
* Finger for Geek Code/PGP * *
* #include "std_disclaimer.h" * http://www.netins.net/showcase/jcgreen *
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
