|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:25:20 -0700 From: "Wayne E. Bouchard" <web@typo.org> To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> Cc: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <8436E53F-A6CC-4208-A491-83EEB7E1C87D@ianai.net> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 03:08:27PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Aaron Glenn wrote: > > >On 2/3/06, Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com> wrote: > >>How about INOC-DBA, which is supposed to have a clue threshold you > >>obtained an ASN by some means in order to have a dial-by-asn phone. > > > >Obtaining an ASN isn't much of a clue threshold. > > Knowing what an ASN is would be a bar too high for 90+% of the people > who call / e-mail abuse desks. > > Getting an INOC-DBA phone is a bar far, far, far too high for 99.99% > of these people. > > -- > TTFN, > patrick Which, as I always saw it, was kind of the point... A way to make sure that the clues can talk to each other when needed but that the noise level remains very low. --- Wayne Bouchard web@typo.org Network Dude http://www.typo.org/~web/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |