[88364] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Edward B. DREGER)
Thu Feb 2 15:47:15 2006
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:46:37 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: Alain Hebert <ahebert@pubnix.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, routing-wg@ripe.net,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tandel?= <standel@info.ucl.ac.be>,
Bruno Quoitin <bqu@info.ucl.ac.be>
In-Reply-To: <43E248F7.805@pubnix.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
AH> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:01:27 -0500
AH> From: Alain Hebert
AH> I'm I alone to find this a bit spammy?
Quite possibly. I for one may well be able to cross off some things
from my "need to finish writing" list.
Less work? Open-source tools? (LGPL, but _c'est la vie_, I suppose.)
Far more operational than the NANOG "McDonalds" thread -- or any number
of others?
I'll take it. If there are also OSPF and IS-IS analogs of C-BGP, I'll
be _really_ happy.
Let's not slap down those who are donating useful tools to the network
engineering community.
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc@brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq@intc.net -*- sam@everquick.net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
