[88353] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 74/8 75/8 76/8
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Wed Feb 1 22:56:25 2006
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0602012216580.1877@soloth.lewis.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 22:55:54 -0500
To: Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org>
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@renesys.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
>On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
>>74.63.0.0/20
>>75.127.0.0/20
>>76.191.0.0/20
>>
>>...should be withdrawn now.
>
>Why?
hannigan@guinness> ping 74.63.1.2
PING 74.63.1.2 (74.63.1.2): 56 data byes
--- 74.63.1.2 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
hannigan@guinness> ping 75.127.1.2
PING 75.127.1.2 (75.127.1.2): 56 data bytes
--- 75.127.1.2 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
hannigan@guinness> ping 76.191.1.2
PING 76.191.1.2 (76.191.1.2): 56 data bytes
--- 76.191.1.2 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
Looks like either my provider is busted or it's down. I figured
it was forgotten about since its the same at 3 of my providers.
Not that big of a deal. I observed it while doing something
else and got distracted by an archives post about it.
Like I said, lots of good reasons not to officially test
in production superblocks, like being forgotten about. It's
easy to do with something like this. I definitely would've
forgotten myself.
-M<
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation (w) 617-395-8574
Member of the Technical Staff Network Operations
hannigan@renesys.com
