|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <20060118210200.GC899331@hiwaay.net> Cc: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:21:35 -0500 To: nanog@merit.edu Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On Jan 18, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net> said: >> It adds zero useful data to the global table, but increases RAM, CPU, >> etc. on every router looking at the global table. > > How much difference is there between one AS (the colo provider) > announcing a prefix and another AS (the customer) announcing it > through > the first AS (the colo provider)? If the space is ARIN assigned > PI, it > isn't going to aggregate with the colo provider's space, so the prefix > will still be a separate announcement. The only difference is the AS > path is one entry longer. Well, obviously, the path entry is longer. :) It's not huge, but it is there. And like I said, many people argue over additions to the table which are actually useful. -- TTFN, patrick
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |