[87929] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AW: Odd policy question.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeffrey I. Schiller)
Sat Jan 14 17:32:36 2006
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:31:12 -0500
From: "Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis@MIT.EDU>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <17353.31279.648068.344084@roam.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Randy Bush wrote:
> could you amplify?
If registrars regularly checked for lame delegations (or checked on
demand). Then a way to attack a domain would be to forge DNS responses
to cause the registrar to remove the domain because it is lame. So
DNSSEC would be needed to be sure...
-Jeff
- --
=============================================================================
Jeffrey I. Schiller
MIT Network Manager
Information Services and Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
77 Massachusetts Avenue Room W92-190
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
617.253.0161 - Voice
jis@mit.edu
============================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDyXuu8CBzV/QUlSsRAnAGAJ0WhItRG6VHtHj1QM21NFw+BYxxoQCgyjcy
fCQ3B4rYRxosPl40/Z/kSBw=
=OMSE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
