[87734] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [OCCAID] 6bone addresses going away in June
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen Massar)
Fri Jan 6 13:23:36 2006
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 19:22:24 +0100
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>
Cc: "Christopher L.Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>,
eric <eric-list-nanog@catastrophe.net>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <5869F9F1-10E4-4A55-9F60-A3CD8D94ADA0@isc.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigEF7E0587AF5C5BFF21BE4B2A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Joe Abley wrote:
>=20
>=20
> On 6-Jan-2006, at 11:23, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>=20
>> guess terado services will get a facelift then too? (since they
>> require/use the 3ffe range for comms)
>=20
> The most recent draft for teredo only requires use of 3FFE::/16 oblique=
ly:
>=20
> 2.6 Global Teredo IPv6 service prefix
>=20
> An IPv6 addressing prefix whose value is XXXX:XXXX:/32.
> (TBD IANA; experiments use the value 3FFE:831F::/32, taken from a
> range of experimental IPv6 prefixes assigned to Microsoft.)
>=20
> Draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-05 expired last October, and I can't find it=
> in the I-D tracker. It doesn't seem like it would be too much of a
> stretch to update that section if a revision was in the works.
As from: http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html
8<-------------------------------------------------
2005-05-10 draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-05.txt
IANA
C. Huitema
Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs
Bytes: 135228
------------------------------------------------->8
aka in queue waiting for IANA to act upon it.
(IANA =3D RFC-Editor/IANA Registration Coordination)
> In real life, does anybody actually use terado? Are there a well-known
> set of teredo servers and relays for which some arbitrary, large ISP
> might measure traffic levels? It seems like if it was enabled it would
> be possible to measure traffic from teredo's bubbles, even if nobody wa=
s
> actually using it to retrieve content.
Check http://www.sixxs.net/tools/aiccu/brokers/ which has a list of most
/all (send mail if you know more :) public tunnel brokers and all other
related items.
Only AS31701 (Consulintel) and AS5511 (OpenTransit / Wanadoo France) are
announcing the 3ffe:831f::/32 prefix though.
But from my logs (including ipv6gate.sixxs.net ;) I don't see any
traffic coming in from it...
Greets,
Jeroen
--------------enigEF7E0587AF5C5BFF21BE4B2A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Jeroen Massar / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iD8DBQFDvrVsKaooUjM+fCMRAlwLAJ4w3NkvGpoRyE05mVzkI8jeQc6rnwCgjRnG
RpUF40Y3QPwwh8gq/7AHIxQ=
=qeKX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigEF7E0587AF5C5BFF21BE4B2A--
