[87729] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: net-op: traffic loads as the result of patching
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vicky_R=F8de?=)
Fri Jan 6 12:04:23 2006
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 09:03:33 -0800
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vicky_R=F8de?= <vickyr@socal.rr.com>
Reply-To: vickyr@socal.rr.com
To: Elijah Savage <esavage@digitalrage.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <43BD9B5C.1060200@digitalrage.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hmm..I thought (correct me if I wrong) wsus followed a mirror
(distributed) model say if a group of servers were pegged the update
process would provide remote clients access to the closet and min
latency host(s) in order to distribute the load prevent bandwidth
saturation.
regards,
/virendra
Elijah Savage wrote:
> Sean Donelan wrote:
>
>>So, maybe an operational question.
>>
>>What are people seeing as far as network traffic loads due to WMF patching
>>activity, e.g. auto-update and manual downloads? Microsoft has used
>>several CDNs in addition to its own servers to distribute the load
>>in the past.
>
> WSUS servers are being pounded right now. Usually 5 to 7% CPU now 72%
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDvqLlpbZvCIJx1bcRAoF4AJ9pi/xlNkX8mSMT4ogZcVccrJ9ijACg854X
JhwaWYg6bEmVf4yHVmY6mQI=
=3oZt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
