[87564] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Compromised machines liable for damage?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hannigan, Martin)
Mon Dec 26 00:25:17 2005
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:21:39 -0500
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan@verisign.com>
To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: "Dave Pooser" <dave.nanog@alfordmedia.com>,
"NANOG" <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C609DC.3FCEFBDF
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, I agree. As usual, I too am 'IANAL'.
Marty
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:smb@cs.columbia.edu]
Sent: Sun Dec 25 23:52:27 2005
To: Hannigan, Martin
Cc: Dave Pooser; NANOG
Subject: Re: Compromised machines liable for damage?=20
In message =
<80632326218FE74899BDD48BB836421A033001@Dul1wnexmb04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.c
om>, "Hannigan, Martin" writes:
>
>Dave, RIAA wins almost 100pct vs p2p'ers ir sues. Its an interesting =
=3D
>dichotomy.
>
"Wins" is too strong a word, since I don't think any have gone to=20
court -- see =
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/arts/AP-Music-Download-Suit.html
as my source.
Besides, it's a very different situation. For my take on liability=20
issues -- note that I'm not a lawyer, and note that this is from 1994=20
-- see http://www.wilyhacker.com/1e/chap12.pdf
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
------_=_NextPart_001_01C609DC.3FCEFBDF
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? </TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Yes, I agree. As usual, I too am 'IANAL'.<BR>
<BR>
Marty<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Steven M. Bellovin [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:smb@cs.columbia.edu">mailto:smb@cs.columbia.edu</A>]<BR>
Sent: Sun Dec 25 23:52:27 2005<BR>
To: Hannigan, Martin<BR>
Cc: Dave Pooser; NANOG<BR>
Subject: Re: Compromised =
machines liable for damage?<BR>
<BR>
In message =
<80632326218FE74899BDD48BB836421A033001@Dul1wnexmb04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.c<B=
R>
om>, "Hannigan, Martin" writes:<BR>
<BR>
><BR>
>Dave, RIAA wins almost 100pct vs p2p'ers ir sues. Its an interesting =
=3D<BR>
>dichotomy.<BR>
><BR>
<BR>
"Wins" is too strong a word, since I don't think any have gone =
to<BR>
court -- see <A =
HREF=3D"http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/arts/AP-Music-Download-Suit.html"=
>http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/arts/AP-Music-Download-Suit.html</A><BR>=
as my source.<BR>
<BR>
Besides, it's a very different situation. For my take on =
liability<BR>
issues -- note that I'm not a lawyer, and note that this is from =
1994<BR>
-- see <A =
HREF=3D"http://www.wilyhacker.com/1e/chap12.pdf">http://www.wilyhacker.co=
m/1e/chap12.pdf</A><BR>
<BR>
=
--Steven M. Bellovin, <A =
HREF=3D"http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb">http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb<=
/A><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C609DC.3FCEFBDF--
