[87480] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter (Was: Awful quiet?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Loch)
Wed Dec 21 13:36:30 2005
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:36:51 -0500
From: Kevin Loch <kloch@hotnic.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <32491354-0E79-474B-AC18-B4D8401BF482@dragondata.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Kevin Day wrote:
> We wouldn't have met the proposed 2005-1
> requirements for a /44 (we don't come close to 100,000 devices), and
> lose functionality if we're required to advertise it through a single
> aggregated address.
The high requirements of the "current" 2005-1 were so thoroughly
rejected at the last ARIN meeting that it will probably return
closer to the original 2005-1 at the next meeting. Something like
"if you have an IPv4 assignment/allocation from ARIN you can
get an end site assignement".
There was also a suggestion to eliminate the "single aggregate
announcement" requirement from both end-site and ISP sections.
- Kevin
