[87476] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter (Was: Awful quiet?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Jun)
Wed Dec 21 11:36:08 2005
Reply-To: <james@towardex.com>
From: "James Jun" <james@towardex.com>
To: "'David Raistrick'" <drais@atlasta.net>
Cc: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:38:37 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.50L0.0512210828220.21406-100000@fryit.atlasta.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Raistrick [mailto:drais@atlasta.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:33 AM
> To: James
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter (Was: Awful quiet?)
>
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, James wrote:
>
> >
> > There are already *several* sane v6 networks in US who have proper
> > routing and high-quality US-Europe inter-connections, including
> > commercial networks that one can purchase transit from.
>
>
> ...that one can purchase transit from in select geographic locations. If
> you're not in one of these areas (NYC, LA, etc), forgetaboutit.
I'm talking about commercial nets you can actually buy transit in more than
NYC and west coast, dual-stacked.
>
> Tunnels do not transit make.
>
Indeed.
James (who deals with most of these commercial nets able to providing high
quality service to customers already in ipv6)
> ..david (who dualstacked a small enterprise for a while. It went away
> eventually.)
>
> ---
> david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> drais@atlasta.net http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
