[87397] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Kristoff)
Thu Dec 15 22:35:29 2005

Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:34:50 -0600
From: John Kristoff <jtk@northwestern.edu>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0512160319330.20032@marvin.argfrp.us.uu.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:29:29 +0000 (GMT)
"Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com> wrote:

> > In my experience that is easier said than done.  However, you remind
> > me of what I think is what most who say they want QoS are really
> > after. DoS protection.  By focusing on DoS mitigation instead of
> > trying to provide service differentiation, things begin to make more
> > sense and actually become much more practical and deployable.
> 
> how does qos help with a dos attack?

My point is that it's not QoS, it's DoS mitigation.  Whatever that
means to you, that is the solution I think most people may ultimately
be looking for when they say they want QoS.

John

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post