[86680] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Mon Nov 14 11:31:46 2005
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:31:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: Blaine Christian <blaine@blaines.net>,
Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20051114162202.7C8A63BFDCF@berkshire.machshav.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> In message <Pine.GSO.4.58.0511141103370.27792@clifden.donelan.com>, Sean Donela
> n writes:
> >
> >On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Blaine Christian wrote:
> >> We are talking about an infrastructure that does not lend itself very
> >> well to market forces. In many places FFTH and/or DSL from a single
> >> carrier are becoming the only options. I would not count a 500ms
> >> satellite hop as an option <grin>.
> >
> >The cable industry claims 97% of the households passed in the US. Why
> >don't you consider it an option?
> >
> Do they claim to pass 97% with two-way cable?
The cable industry claims 91% of households passed with two-way cable.
