[86667] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IAB and "private" numbering

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven M. Bellovin)
Sun Nov 13 14:34:35 2005

From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
To: peter@peter-dambier.de
Cc: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>,
	nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 13 Nov 2005 20:21:50 +0100."
             <4377924E.109@peter-dambier.de> 
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:34:07 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


In message <4377924E.109@peter-dambier.de>, Peter Dambier writes:
>
>Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>>
>...
>> 
>> I don't believe there is a 'rfc1918' in v6 (yet), I agree that it doesn't
>> seem relevant, damaging perhaps though :)
>> 
>
>Yes, there was rfc1918 in IPv6 right from the beginning:
>
>Site local addresses "0xF80" dont leave a site. They can be routed within
>a site but they never get outside. Just like rfc1918 addresses do.
>

Yes, and site-local addresses have been removed from the spec, because 
of the many problems they cause.

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post