[86626] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level3 Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Per Gregers Bilse)
Fri Nov 11 17:26:56 2005
From: Per Gregers Bilse <bilse@networksignature.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:26:02 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20051111215009.GG7619@vacation.karoshi.com.>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Nov 11, 9:50pm bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> EGP-BGP
> BGP-BGP2
> BGP2-BGP3
Yes ... but those were easier, more overlap was possible, especially at
the edge. We had EGP peers right into BGP4 times. CIDR was more
universal, outright a 'flag day' all things considered. But never mind ...
> i can only hope you are right. re-kindling the excitment and enthusiasim
> that once existed will be a highlight.
Lemme see ... "Cisco hires Tony Li to lead next generation development." ?
Interesting thought, if nothing else.
Then, how about "All the big telcos rehire all the nerdy people that
got p****d off and left a long time ago".
I see problems ahead ... :-/
-- Per
