[86480] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Gauthier)
Mon Nov 7 11:23:35 2005
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:21:20 -0500
From: Eric Gauthier <eric@roxanne.org>
To: Robert Boyle <robert@tellurian.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20051107105749.03b76d40@tellurian.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Robert,
> All of our network is now patched for the latest Cisco advisory. We were
> already running fixed code on a few routers when the advisory came
> out so we knew the code was stable and moved to it on all other
> boxes.
I'm not exactly "in the know" on this one, but the heap-overflow advisory
that we've seen indicates that the IOS updates Cisco put out are not patches
for this problem:
"Cisco has devised counter-measures by implementing extra checks to
enforce the proper integrity of system timers. This extra validation
should reduce the possibility of heap-based overflow attack vectors
achieving remote code execution."
from http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20051102-timers.shtml
We've asked Cisco for a better explanation - namely, are their recommended
updates "patches" to the problem (i.e. repairs) or simply mitigating
updates that make is harder to exploit. The wording of their advisory seems
to indicate the latter. This latter case is what worries me since it implies
that there is a fundamental problem in IOS, the problem still exists even after
patching, and that Cisco can't readily repair it. Unfortunately, so far we've
gotten the run-around and haven't been able to get a better answer, again
leading me to believe the worst.
Eric :)
