[86471] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP terminology question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Howard C. Berkowitz)
Mon Nov 7 08:33:16 2005
In-Reply-To: <17262.23844.626115.614224@roam.psg.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:32:38 -0500
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@gettcomm.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
At 9:44 AM -1000 11/6/05, Randy Bush wrote:
> > A peer should never announce a route it has already announced unless
>> that route is withdrawn.
>
>one of many counterexamples: change in igp will cause change in
>med. any attribute changes, and announcement is required.
>
>e.g., an internal igp oscillation could cause what the op
>describes.
For the OP, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3345.txt
