[86387] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: classful routes redux
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fred Baker)
Wed Nov 2 19:04:25 2005
In-Reply-To: <20051102235136.GD15252@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Cc: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>, nanog@merit.edu
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:03:43 -0800
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
actually, no, I could compare a /48 to a class A.
On Nov 2, 2005, at 3:51 PM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>
>
> er.. would this be a poor characterization of the IPv6 addressing
> architecture which is encouraged by the IETF and the various RIR
> members?
>
> class A == /32
> class B == /48
> class C == /56
> hostroute == /64
>
> (and just think of all that spam than can originate from all those
> "loose" IP addresses in that /64 for your local SMTP server!!! Yummy)
>
> -- Oat Willie
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already
tomorrow in Australia." (Charles Schulz )
