[86382] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Deepak Jain)
Wed Nov 2 18:21:10 2005
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:20:39 -0500
From: Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net>
Reply-To: deepak@ai.net
To: Pete Templin <petelists@templin.org>
Cc: Jeff Aitken <jaitken@aitken.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <43694817.8030209@templin.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> For me, plenty, but a four-POP single-state network usually has
> different constraints on "scalable". However, I'd categorize it as one
> community-list per MED tier (i.e. if you just want near/far, that's two
> tiers, etc.) and one community-list entry per POP (or group of POPs, if
> you have some grouping logic embedded in your internal communities).
>
I think Pete is saying that as long as you aren't a control-nazi, its a
good system. :)
Given that constraint, I wonder how of NANOG it applies to. ;)
Deepak
