[86302] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (vijay gill)
Tue Nov 1 11:17:30 2005
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:16:58 -0500
From: vijay gill <vgill@vijaygill.com>
To: Pete Templin <petelists@templin.org>
Cc: John Curran <jcurran@mail.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <4367888C.1030102@templin.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Pete Templin wrote:
>
>
> John Curran wrote:
>
>> Cold-potato only addresses the long-haul; there's still cost on the
>> receiving network even if its handed off at the closest interconnect
>> to the final destination(s).
>
> And there's still revenue, as the traffic is going to customers (we all
> filter our prefixes carefully, right?). What's the problem with
> cold-potato again, or should we all just try to double-dip?
>
> pt
ah yes, double dipping. On-net traffic should be charged a lot less,
because after all, it is double dipping.
/vijay
