[86159] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Oct 24 14:21:52 2005
To: John Dupuy <jdupuy-list@socket.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:53:12 CDT."
<6.0.3.0.2.20051024125255.04377c80@mail.socket.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:21:23 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1130178083_16724P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:53:12 CDT, John Dupuy said:
> In fact, this is technically feasible right now with IPv4. Does anyone know
> of a pair of ISPs doing this?
"technically feasible" and "business case reasonable" are two different things.
Under what conditions does this sort of cooperation with a competitor make sense?
--==_Exmh_1130178083_16724P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFDXSYjcC3lWbTT17ARAiJkAKDzkxSqUK5JRChkDINfyDQgJ1oOvwCeOLHi
kmmSAhX9Go6UqxJAeENuU/Q=
=UM8D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1130178083_16724P--
