[86131] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen Massar)
Mon Oct 24 06:51:19 2005
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: Peter Salanki <peter.salanki@bahnhof.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <E8804ADD-98D4-427D-A2BD-5043FE7A7D7A@bahnhof.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:50:42 +0200
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--=-R8ZK/P1pagpw01GqAU4L
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
[re-ordered front-posting]
24 okt 2005 kl. 11.35 skrev Jeroen Massar:
> > The multihoming that people here seem to want though is the Provider
> > Independent one, and that sort of automatically implies some routing
> > method: read BGP.
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 11:40 +0200, Peter Salanki wrote:
> Or shim6 :)
Of course, note that I wrote 'some routing method', which effectively
shim6 will be doing using some translations. Though I have to see it
first that it is up and running and people start using it, having good
hopes though but there are too many requirements and thus it won't fit
everybody the way they like it. Some people will simply require PI space
and nothing else... (*)
Greets,
Jeroen
* =3D For IPv6 this means: be a LIR, plan 200 customers -> get it.
--=-R8ZK/P1pagpw01GqAU4L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Jeroen Massar / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/
iD8DBQBDXLyCKaooUjM+fCMRAmhkAJ9RC4dReEaFIL6UCNRnxPuYmzUYKwCgmVKn
Rvs1U9aZBWwSdJASkQcEPso=
=640S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-R8ZK/P1pagpw01GqAU4L--
