[86129] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Oct 24 06:10:39 2005
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 03:10:04 -0700
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
To: Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <OFE786AE75.444835DB-ON802570A4.0034B648-802570A4.0035829E@btradianz.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==========D40A1D041A425125A365==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
--On October 24, 2005 10:44:31 AM +0100 Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com wrote:
>
> One way to do this is for two ISPs to band together
> in order that each ISP can sell half of a joint
> multihoming service. Each ISP would set aside a
> subset of their IP address space to be used by many
> such multihomed customers. Each ISP would announce
> the subset from their neighbor's space which means
> that there would be two new DFZ prefixes to cover
> many multihomed customers.
>
[snip...]
Except this completely disregards some customers concerns about having
provider independence and being able to change providers without
having a major financial disincentive to do so. That _IS_ a real
business concern, no matter how much the IETF would like to pretend
it does not matter.
Owen
--=20
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
--==========D40A1D041A425125A365==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFDXLL8n5zKWQ/iqj0RAkt0AJ9sr5s6oF5gYcKgu8gPN0KQmW5flQCeO5fD
ihbCYBm7ZuWzyJSFiy1muXg=
=PwPX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========D40A1D041A425125A365==========--
