[86112] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level3 Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Oct 24 00:00:56 2005
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org>,
nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:16:58 PDT."
<17243.54170.206797.110645@roam.psg.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:00:11 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1130126411_2866P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:16:58 PDT, Randy Bush said:
>
> > A friend of mine has got a colo box sitting, single-homed
>
> friends don't let friends home singly
I dunno. I got a lot of single-homed friends. If I got them all
to multihome, and everybody else on NANOG got all *their* single-homed
friends multihome, it might do something suboptimal to the routing tables.
Do we *really* want to do anything to encourage a higher burn rate of AS numbers
before we've deployed 32-bit AS number support?
--==_Exmh_1130126411_2866P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFDXFxLcC3lWbTT17ARAr9DAKDzZU3qtcFhWIkFpQ2KUlZO8seUvACeJUO/
9w0HZuqqhSafx/5rjRR7c0k=
=mZd9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1130126411_2866P--
