[86067] in North American Network Operators' Group
[Fwd: Re: FCC Outage Reports ..(.was Verizon outage in Southern California?)]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vicky Rode)
Fri Oct 21 16:10:33 2005
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:10:00 -0700
From: Vicky Rode <vickyr@socal.rr.com>
Reply-To: vickyr@socal.rr.com
To: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Just taking a quick poll to see if nanog community would consider this
a worthwhile effort to pursue?
regards,
/virendra
- -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: FCC Outage Reports ..(.was Verizon outage in Southern
California?)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:26:51 +0300 (EEST)
From: Juuso Lehtinen <jalehtin@cc.hut.fi>
To: nanog@merit.edu
References: <153C7BD7A0BE5E4C82C46650FEA94130050370BF@MKA46.pcc.int>
<435873F1.7050702@socal.rr.com> <43592842.2050606@nrg4u.com>
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Here we see again that the secrecy ("to prevent terrorism") of this
> information costs more than having it in the open as the FCC did in
> the past. The whole terrorism sham was just a convenient excuse to
> prevent outsiders from assessing the quality of the carriers network.
In the field of security engineering, this is something called security
through obscurity. Terrorists are well funded, and they, no doubt, can get
hold on those 'secret' fiber maps if they have interest in them.
> Do I feel better that neither me nor the terrorist know that my "redundant"
> fiber routes are in the same dig? Or in the same cable even? We all know
> how reliable the carriers bonus driven sales droid promises are...
Only ones suffering are us...
- --
juuso lehtinen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDWUsYpbZvCIJx1bcRAh2IAJsGJqCMtsuyMjYSDJFhCjzI07GBKwCfW7aG
uPBNNwW0I75xGyKP1Tlg9iw=
=l5Jg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
